About your Search

20121112
20121120
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)
a single question, what are you willing to give. you know, when john boehner appears, they say are you willing to accept higher rates. no one says what are you going to do about entitlements or anything, there's no question of the president whether he will compromise and what that would look like. >> paul: steve, what do you think the republicans ought to do here? is there a way out for them or are they going to be pushed back into a corner where they have no choice, but to concede that they have to raise tax rates or else go over the cliff and get blamed for that? >> well, it's a tough situation for them. there's no question about it because as you know, the default position, if we don't do anything is for the taxes to go up on everybody on january 1st, and that's something i think both sides want to avoid. it's very interesting, the thing that happened this week to start the week, was who was the first person that barack obama met with in the white house since his election, the labor unions, the labor block, that tells a lot who is driving policy at least at the start of the second t
is representative john heck and peter king. here is their interpretation of the closed door hearings. >> the initial talking points put together in unclassified format at the house intelligence committee initially did state that al qaeda affiliated groups were involved. however, by the time we understand that went through its editing process after it left langley that reference was taken out. >> the fact is the best estimate of the intelligence community on september 15th and 16th was that there was direct al qaeda involvement. that was taken out. to me, again, if i had to presume i would say it was somebody in the administration had to have taken it out. because there was nobody in the director of national intelligence office. nobody in the cia that did it. so, it was someone else that did it. >> someone in the administration. if you go to the front page of foxnews.com right now you will see the big story on there that's racing raising the question in that piece. we will be speaking to peter king to try to figure out who the administration got the intelligence information their hands and said, okay
to me three weeks ago mitt romney would get fewer votes than john mccain and it looks like he'll be 2 million viewer, i would have been du dumbfounded. >> michael, thanks for joining us. we have had a good time arguing and discussing things occasionally agreeing on things but often not. let me ask you about that republican world view. i wonder what color the sky is. how did they see this election the way rasmussen pollsters would see it, basically a romney romp? how did they get it so wrong? >> i think there was a feeding into a mythology that somehow the country would categorically reject the president because we had, that the country would somehow say to itself, you know, we can't live with this new land of big government health care, big government spending, et cetera, because we can't. and that's fine. the problem was in articulating to the american people why we can't live with those things, why those things are bad, and instead, as you have noted many times on this program, we got w waylaid by conversations about women's bodies and abortion and things that didn't go to the nub o
on the ocean surface is residual. the coast guard suspended its search. >> john mcafee has been eluding officials for days. he is wanted in connection with a murder on his property. they believe they have been looking for him for a week. since the manhunt began, he has been talking to tech reporters on the phone. he told them he has been in his house. with the news hostess is turning off the ovens, twinkies are turning to overnight sensation. hostss has made other knacks. they announced they are shutting down. have to lay off 18,000 employees. find out more about these and other stories foxnews.com. back to you. >> shannon: my thought is as you say that, thousands of dollars for snack cakes but the producer says i'd pay it. those are people willing to pay it out there. >> if you want to spend thousands on twinkies you should -- >> i don't know. donate it. it's the holidays. there are people in need. write a check to red cross instead. >> shannon: thanks, peter. when we told you that for example were lining up for black friday, you might have said no way. here is more proof. this is a sh
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)